Legal Opinion

George Benz Sons, Inc. v. Ericson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 30, 1948No. 34,703PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 34 N.W.2d 725. Appeal by plaintiff and by interveners (hereinafter named) from an order (1) denying their motion for a temporary injunction, and (2) vacating a restraining order issued at the commencement of these proceedings.

This action was commenced when George Benz Sons, Inc., a Minnesota corporation engaged in the business of manufacturing and wholesaling intoxicating liquors as defined by M.S.A.340.07, sought and obtained from the district court of Ramsey county an order dated December 20, 1947, temporarily restraining defendant, Dudley C. Ericson, as state liquor control…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Giozza v. TiernanSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Mahoney v. Joseph Triner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Glicker v. Michigan Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  5. City of Chicago v. NetcherIllinois Supreme Court · 1899

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Beck v. GroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Arens v. Village of RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. Federal Distillers, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. State v. SaugenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  5. Thomas v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API