Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Zaubi v. Hoejme

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 17, 1980No. Civ. A. 80-1567PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TEITELBAUM, District Judge.

The instant action has been brought on behalf of two minor children by their guardian ad litem in an effort to vindicate the claimed right of the children, as United States citizens, to live within the United States and enjoy the protection of its laws. The Court is satisfied that it has jurisdiction in this case.

While this litigation is the first in which the children have been made formal parties, the parents of these two innocents have ceaselessly been engaged in judicial and extrajudicial efforts to obtain the right of custody and actual custody of the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Moore v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. In Re BurrusSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Afroyim v. RuskSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. Holschuh v. Holland-MoritzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ankenbrandt Ex Rel. L. R. v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Rogers v. JanzenDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1989
  3. Chinnery v. King IISupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2026
  4. Hill v. King IISupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API