Legal Opinion

Douville v. Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1897PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Saginaw; Kendrick, J-. Assumpsit by Henry Douville against the Farmers’ Mutual Fire Insurance Company of Saginaw county on a policy of insurance. From a judgment for plaintiff on verdict directed by the court, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

On the 27th of April, 1895, the defendant company issued to the plaintiff a policy of insurance upon a house and contents and barn and contents belonging to the plaintiff. In the policy it is stated that the buildings were on section 31. The policy contained a clause reading as follows:

“The said company have the right to cancel any policy whenever the board of directors shall deem there is sufficient cause therefor. In such case the secretary shall give the party insured, and the party to whom this policy is payable in case of loss, notice in writing or otherwise of the determination of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. Ohio InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Towle v. Ionia, Eaton & Barry Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Becker v. Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Borgards v. Farmers' Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Lum v. United States Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Smith v. Grange Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Cummings v. Conn. Gen. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1930
  3. Sanborn v. Income Guaranty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Akers v. Farmers Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. King v. Farmers Electric Coop., Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API