Legal Opinion
State v. Oswald
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided December 8, 1999No. 97-1026-CRPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.
¶ 1. Theodore Oswald appeals from a nineteen-count judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. A new trial is warranted, he argues, because of juror bias, juror misconduct and ineffective assistance of trial counsel. First, he contends that the circuit court erroneously denied his motions to remove three jurors for cause, forcing him to use his peremptory strikes to remove them. Because he used his peremptory strikes to correct a court error, he requests a new trial where he would receive his full statutory entitlement of peremptory strikes.
¶ 2.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- State v. PoellingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. PitschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. KnightWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. GibbsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Theodore W. Oswald v. Daniel BertrandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- State v. NielsenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
- State v. OswaldCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
- State v. Maltese Lavele WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.