Legal Opinion

United States v. Marc A. Royer

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 31, 1990No. 89-1707PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

This is a single issue criminal appeal in which defendant-appellant Marc A. Royer questions the district court’s application of the sentencing guidelines. Notwithstanding defense counsel’s able advocacy, the case serves mainly to corroborate Lucretius’ epigram: “Nil posse creari de nilo.” We translate the phrase, roughly, to mean “nothing can be created from nothing”— and we believe it suits the case.

I

Section 3E1.1 of the sentencing guidelines provides for a two point reduction in offense level “[i]f the defendant clearly demonstrates a recognition and affirmative…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Wilfredo Diaz-VillafaneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. Bertie Alexander WrightCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. James Edward HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Robert Spraggins, A/K/A Bob StaggsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Ramon Mata-Grullon, A/K/A Santos PerezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. United States v. SaxenaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. MorilloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Luciano MosqueraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Eric N. UngerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Robert E. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API