Legal Opinion

United States v. James Edward Harris

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 22, 1989No. 89-5511PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPENCER, District Judge:

Appellant James Edward Harris (“Harris”) challenges the district court’s refusal to grant him a two-step offense level reduction pursuant to Sentencing Guideline § 3El.l(a) based on his purported acceptance of responsibility for his criminal conduct. Harris also contends that even if the trial court did not err in declining to grant him an offense level reduction, he is entitled to be resentenced because the district court failed to articulate the standard and burden of proof that should be applied in resolving this sentencing dispute. For the reasons stated below, we…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Tracey Donell White, United States of America v. Clarence JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Eddie Wayne RobersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Helen Faye NunleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Jose Luis BarretoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. United States v. William George HowardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. John W. McDowell Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Glennis L. Bolden, United States of America v. Clifford E. BoldenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Ervin Charles JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Alejandro CastellanosCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API