Legal Opinion
United States v. Saxena
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided October 3, 2000No. 99-1842PublishedCited by 191 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant Sanjay Saxena serves up a salmagundi of alleged errors. The main ingredient is his contention that the government reneged on obligations that it undertook in a plea agreement. Other morsels include the district court’s failure specifically to inform him of the consequences of his guilty plea and its alleged missteps in the course of sentencing. Although the appellant’s bill of fare contains some food for thought, close per-lustration shows that it lacks any real substance. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment below.
I. BACKGROUND
The appellant, a software…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Paul J. SavoieCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. BenchimolSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by191 opinions
- United States v. TeeterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- United States v. MoncivaisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. YorkCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Almonte-NunezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Reyes-SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
186 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.