Legal Opinion
Ball v. City of Chandler Improvement District No. 48
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 6, 1986No. 1 CA-CIV 8036PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONTRERAS, Judge.
This is an appeal from an award of costs and attorney’s fees in an action successfully prosecuted by certain landowners to invalidate an improvement district established by appellant, City of Chandler (Chandler) and its city officials. We conclude that the trial court correctly found “that the ‘zoning agreements issue’ portion of the litigation ‘arose out of a contract express or implied’ within the meaning of A.R.S. § 12-341.01,” and affirm the award of attorney’s fees and costs.
On June 9, 1983, Chandler officially formed Improvement District No. 48 for purposes of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Beytagh v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- ASH, Inc. v. Mesa Unified School District No. 4Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Vaughan v. BowerDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Desert Palm Surgical Group, P.L.C. v. PettaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Kennedy v. Linda Brock Automotive Plaza, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Pointe Resorts, Inc. v. CulbertsonArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- Tom Mulcaire Contracting, LLC v. City of CottonwoodCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011