Tom Mulcaire Contracting, LLC v. City of Cottonwood
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORRIS, Judge.
¶ 1 Defendants/Appellants City of Cottonwood and certain elected officials (collectively, the “City”) appeal from a judgment awarding Tom Mulcaire Contracting, LLC, fees under Arizona Revised Statutes (“AR.S.”) section 12-2030 (2003), a statute that requires a court to award attorneys’ fees to a prevailing party in a mandamus action. The issue presented in this appeal is whether a party is entitled to fees under this statute if it does not obtain an order compelling performance of a duty or other such relief. We agree with the City that, in general, a party must obtain…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Crescent Amusement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Wyatt v. WehmuellerArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- John C. Lincoln Hospital v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Marcus v. FoxArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Loiselle v. COSAS MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Melinda S. Workman v. Verde Wellness Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Hess v. PurcellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Merrick v. EscapuleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016