Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Dancy

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 1, 1892PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court. Tried before Hou. John P. Hubbard. cited, L. No brief came to hands of the reporter.

1Opinion of the CourtHead, J.

— This action joins case and trespass in one count; case, in that defendant “failed and refused to stop the train,” at Letohatchie, the station of plaintiff’s destination, whereby she, a passenger, was unable to get off; trespass, in that “plaintiff was carried past said station about one half mile and put off with her baggage against her protest and objection.” Plea, general denial. A failure and refusal to stop the train, as alleged, of itself constituted an actionable wrong. Such failure and refusal if committed, might by some matter, pleaded in avoidance, be justified or excused, and yet,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ala. Great Southern Railroad v. SellersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Southern Bell Telephone Co. v. FrancisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. QuickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Hockensmith v. WintonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Southern Life Health Ins. Co. v. MorganAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API