Legal Opinion

Mothersead v. Harrington

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 23, 1926No. 16293PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, C.

Parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court, inverse to their order here. On July 27, 1922, one Calvert and his wife entered into a written contract for the sale of an oil and gas lease to plaintiffs Herrington and three others, on certain 80 acres of land belonging to the Calverts for the bonus sum of $2,200, lease being attached to the contract. The contract, the purchase price, and lease were placed in Oklahoma State Bank of Jennings “to be held in escrow under the terms hereinafter set forth,” among other things, to wit: That Calvert was a minor, but…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hudspeth v. Union Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  2. Secrest v. OrganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  3. Nelson v. PaxtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  4. Brogan v. KriepeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  5. State Ex Rel. Strain v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. John L. Walker Co. v. AldenDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1934
  2. Seattle-First National Bank v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1985
  3. Van Meter v. State Ex Rel. MotherseadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. In Re Planters Mechanics BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. State Ex Rel. Mothersead v. RaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API