Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Mothersead v. Ray

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 29, 1928No. 17253PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TEEHEE, C.

On December 2, 1922, R. O. Ray, trustee for a group of landowners, as plaintiff, recovered a judgment for $10,000, against the Oklahoma State Bank of Frederick, W. S. Langford, and James Gresham, as defendants. The action was based on an escrow agreement between plaintiff, hereinafter also referred to as the judgment creditor, and Langford and Gresham, whereunder these defendants" deposited $10,000 in said bank as an escrow account payable to plaintiff unjder certain conditions, compliance with which plaintiff had alleged. The bank disclaimed any interest in the account, but refused…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hale v. FrostSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Lawson v. WarrenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. American Trust & Savings Bank v. McGettiganIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Woerishoffer v. North River Constraction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Snow v. WinslowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Van Meter v. State Ex Rel. MotherseadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Wilkins v. GannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API