Legal Opinion

Belliamo v. Marlin-Rockwell Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Although the claimant worked substantially the whole of the preceding year, during sixteen weeks thereof he worked but five days per week and during fifteen other weeks but four days per week. Subdivision 1 or 2 of ¿ *846section 14 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law cannot reasonably or fairly be applied. The average weekly wage should be computed under subdivision 3. (Prentice v. New York Stale Railways, 181 App. Div. 144; Limone v. Atlas Can Co., 202 id. 862.) There is not in the record proof of the previous earnings of other employees of the same class in the same or most similar employment,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claim of La Mont Prentice v. New York State RailwaysAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  2. McDonald v. Burden Iron Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Andrew F. Mahony Co. v. MarshallDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1931
  2. State, Department of Natural Resources v. DupreeAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Miller v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Claim of Remmert v. WeidenmeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  5. Matter of Foster v. FedEx Frgt. Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API