Legal Opinion

State, Department of Natural Resources v. Dupree

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1983No. 6047PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Chief Justice.

AS 23.30.220(2) provides that the average weekly wage of an injured employee is that most favorable to the employee calculated by dividing fifty-two into the total wages earned in any one of the three calendar years immediately preceding injury.1 Departure from this formula is sanctioned when the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board determines that the employee’s average weekly wage cannot be “fairly calculated” under subsection (2).2 AS 23.30.220(3). At issue in this case is whether Dupree’s average weekly wage was fairly calculated under that section because…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hastings v. Earth Satellite Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  2. Hood v. State, Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Argonaut Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Marshall v. Andrew F. Mahony Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  5. St. Pierre v. St. Regis Paper Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Rca-Oms, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Phillips v. Houston Contracting, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Brunke v. Rogers & BablerAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State Department of Transportation & Public Facilities v. GronroosAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  5. STATE DEPT. OF TRANSP. & PUB. FAC. v. GronroosAlaska Supreme Court · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API