Legal Opinion

City of Houston v. Anchor Hocking Glass Corp.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 22, 1971No. 15761PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

This suit was instituted by appellee, hereinafter called Anchor-Hocking, to recover the sewer charges inadvertently made by and paid to appellant, hereinafter called City, for services which were not rendered. After trial to the court on stipulations of fact judgment was rendered for appellee for the amount paid within four years from the date of suit plus pre-judgment interest.

The principal issue is whether the two year statute of limitations, Article 5526, V.A.C.S., rather than the four year statute, Article 5527, V.A.C.S., is applicable under the facts of this case. This,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. International Printing Pressmen & Assistants' Union v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Robinson v. VarnellTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  3. International Printing Pressmen & Assitant's Union of North America v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Gulf Oil Corporation v. Lone Star Producing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  5. Certain-Teed Products Corporation v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Black Lake Pipe Line Co. v. Union Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Laredo Hides Co., Inc. v. H & H Meat Products Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Country Cupboard, Inc. v. Texstar Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Bluebonnet Savings Bank v. Jones Country, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1995
  5. Gonzales v. Lockwood Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API