Legal Opinion
Civil Service Commission v. Pekrul
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided January 23, 1991No. Nos. 087414, 087653PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPellegrino, J.
The plaintiffs, the civil service commission of the city of Waterbury and Edmund Jayaraj, both individually and as administrator of the civil service commission and director of personnel of the city of Waterbury, instituted the two actions under consideration here. The first is an action in quo warranto (Docket No. 087414) seeking to oust five named police officers, the defendants in that action, who were appointed as detectives by the superintendent of police and the Waterbury board of police commissioners. The second is a mandamus action (Docket No. 087653) seeking to compel the board of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Beccia v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Shanley v. JankuraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Resnick v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Alcorn, State's Attorney, Ex Rel. Hoerle v. ThomasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
3Cited by5 opinions
- McArdle v. RodriguezAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Civil Service Commission v. PekrulSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Gesmonde, Pietrosimone, Sgrignari, Pinkus & Sachs v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Demarest v. Norwalk Fire Department, No. Cv 98 0165007 S (Mar. 24, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
- Gesmonde v. City of Waterbury, No. 0110720 (Aug. 3, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993