Legal Opinion

Gesmonde v. City of Waterbury, No. 0110720 (Aug. 3, 1993)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided August 3, 1993No. 0110720Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The plaintiff law firm has filed this action to recover legal fees from the defendant for services rendered between August 1988 and January 1992. The complaint alleges a contract for these services and in the alternative, a quantum meruit count for recovery of the fair value of the legal services. The defendant denies or pleads insufficient knowledge as to all of the plaintiff's allegations, except as to the allegation that the City of Waterbury is a duly authorized municipal corporation. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pepe v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. In re Keijam T.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Civil Service Commission v. PekrulConnecticut Superior Court · 1989
  4. Civil Service Commission v. PekrulConnecticut Superior Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API