Legal Opinion
Stockmeier v. Psychological Review Panel
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided June 1, 2006No. 42063PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Rose, C. J.:
In this proper person appeal and petition for rehearing, we interpret several provisions of NRS 213.1214, which provides that sex offenders must receive certification from a Psychological Review Panel (the Psych Panel) before they can be released on parole. We previously issued an opinion in this case affirming the district court’s decision. Appellant Robert Stockmeier subsequently filed a petition for rehearing, and we withdrew our prior opinion. We conclude that rehearing is warranted under NRAP 40(c), grant Stock-meier’s petition for rehearing, and issue…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McKay v. Board of Sup'rs of Carson CityNevada Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. CatanioNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Harris Associates v. Clark County School DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 2003
- Cleghorn v. HessNevada Supreme Court · 1993
- Coast Hotels & Casinos, Inc. v. Nevada State Labor CommissionNevada Supreme Court · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Moor v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Pawlik v. Shyang-Fenn DengNevada Supreme Court · 2018
- URIAS (BRANDON) v. DIST. CT. (STATE) (CRIMINAL)Nevada Supreme Court · 2025
- Nevada Restaurant Services, Inc. v. Clark CountyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2013
- Blount v. BlountNevada Supreme Court · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.