Legal Opinion

Phillip Anthony Roberts v. State of Minnesota

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 17, 2014No. A14-169PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LARKIN, Judge.

Appellant pleaded guilty to second-degree sale of a controlled substance in 2005. In 2013, appellant petitioned for postcon-viction relief, seeking to withdraw his guilty plea. He based his request on information regarding testing deficiencies at the crime laboratory that tested the controlled substance in his case. The post-conviction court concluded that appellant’s petition was time-barred under Minn.Stat. § 590.01, subd. 4(a) (2012), and summarily denied the petition. Appellant challenges the postconviction court’s ruling, arguing that his petition should have been…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Goeb v. TharaldsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Gassler v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. Sanchez v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. Carlton v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Antoine Goodman v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  2. Charlie Junior Pryor v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  3. Harry Jerome Evans v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
  4. Jamillo Dante Spight v. State of Minnesota, A15-2007Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  5. Jose Manuel Flores v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API