Legal Opinion

M.K.D. Capital Corp. v. Miller

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ira Gammerman, J.

Defendants move to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action, asserting that plaintiffs claim is barred by the Statute of Frauds. Plaintiff seeks compensation allegedly agreed to orally by defendants for having facilitated the purchase by defendants of real property in California. No written memorandum of the *1003agreement exists, but plaintiff argues the Statute of Frauds does not apply because of the statute’s exception for licensed real estate brokers. I find that the Statute of Frauds does apply, and that, additionally, plaintiff is precluded from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Merex A.G. Merex Corporation and Peter C. Lachmann v. Fairchild Weston Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. Roman v. LobeNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Special Event Entertainment v. Rockefeller Center, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  4. Galbreath-Ruffin Corp. v. 40th & 3rd Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Bendell v. De DominicisNew York Court of Appeals · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stainless Broadcasting Co. v. Clear Channel Broadcasting Licenses, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Steve Elliot, LLC v. Foxboro ProductionsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API