Legal Opinion · Dissent

Steve Elliot, LLC v. Foxboro Productions

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 4, 2010Published

1Dissent

Weston, J.E

(dissenting and voting to affirm the order in the following memorandum). While I agree that there is no requirement that a contract to pay a licensed real estate broker must be written, the majority incorrectly assumes that plaintiff is licensed and thus exempt from the requirement that a contract to pay must be in writing (see General Obligations Law § 5-701 [a] [10]). There is nothing in the record to support this assumption. Accordingly, I vote to affirm the order of the Civil Court, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

It is incumbent on a party moving for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Klein v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Lesocovich v. 180 Madison Avenue Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Eaton Associates v. Highland Broadcasting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API