Legal Opinion
Michel v. Anderson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 8, 1993No. Civ. A. 93-0039 (HHG)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAROLD H. GREENE, District Judge.
I
Background
In this case, thirteen Republican Members of the House of Representatives, 1 led by Minority Leader Robert Michel (R — Ill.), 2 seek to enjoin enforcement 3 of House Rule XII which was amended on January 5, 1993 to authorize Delegates from the District of Columbia, Guam, American Samoa, and the Virgin Islands, as well as the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico to vote in the House’s Committee of the Whole. The Committee of the Whole is comprised of all Members of the House, and it is where a substantial portion of the chamber’s business is…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Krim M. Ballentine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Robert H. Michel v. Donnald K. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Rangel v. BoehnerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Spence v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Ago, Washington Attorney General Reports2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.