Legal Opinion

Spence v. Clinton

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 9, 1996No. Civil Action 96-01671PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SPORKIN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motion to dismiss and Plaintiff’s opposition thereto. The Court heard oral argument from the parties on October 3, 1996.

Plaintiffs are forty-one members of the U.S. House of Representatives seeking in-junctive and declaratory relief. Plaintiffs claim that the President, acting through the Secretary of Defense, has violated his Constitutional duties by failing to'comply with the statutory mandates of Title II of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996, Subtitle C, §§ 281-238, 110 Stat.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. United States of America Ex Rel. Joel D. Joseph, and Joel D. Joseph v. Howard W. CannonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  5. Figueroa v. LeFevreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Banner v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API