Legal Opinion

Uvalde Paving Co. v. Brooks

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 16, 1935No. 12081PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOONEY, Justice.

This is an original application for mandamus by relator against the respondents and is an echo from the case of Hinton v. Uvalde Paving Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) reported in 77 S.W.(2d) 733, 736. It will be observed that, on its claim being rejected, the Uvalde Paving Company, relator herein, filed suit against Mrs. Eva Hinton (and her present husband) administratrix of the estate of D. H. Mitchell, her late husband, to recover balance due on two paving certificates issued by the city of Terrell, and to establish a statutory lien on the lot of land in Terrell benefited by the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Wells v. LittlefieldTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Hovey v. ShepherdTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Conley v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Perkins v. SterneTexas Supreme Court · 1859

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Myers v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Curtis v. NoblesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Hinton v. Uvalde Paving Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API