Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Sterne

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1859PublishedCited by 51 opinions

Error from Nacogdoches. Tried below before A. W. O. Hicks. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

The plaintiff in error was the plaintiff in the court below. The suit was instituted against Mrs. E. C. R. Sterne, as administratrix of her deceased husband, Adolphus Sterne. The statement of facts shows, that the plaintiff was the owner and holder of several promissory notes, executed by Adolphus Sterne, and secured by a mortgage on lands. The notes became barred by the statute of limitations, and Adolphus Sterne, after they were barred, acknowledged the notes in writing, to be just claims against him, and promised to pay them; but, in the said written acknowledgment and promise, there was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Duty v. GrahamTexas Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Ewell v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Dallas Farm MacHinery Company v. ReavesTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Pope v. BeauchampTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Howard Hume, Administrators, Etc. v. WindomTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Goldfrank, Frank & Co. v. YoungTexas Supreme Court · 1885

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API