Legal Opinion
Kassan v. Bledsoe
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 25, 1967No. Civ. 30967PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
Melvin E. Kassan appeals from a summary judgment granted respondents Russell W. Bledsoe and Leon J. Garrie in Kassan’s action for malicious prosecution against these and other defendants.
Kassan is an attorney who was originally served as a “Doe” defendant in certain actions directed against several defendants, principal among them one H. Red or Hugh Fraser, his client. Bledsoe and Garrie are attorneys who, together, represented the opponents of Fraser and Kassan in the earlier actions. In each of those actions a nonsuit was entered in favor of Kassan who, thereafter, filed this action for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Murdock v. GerthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Bealmear v. Southern Cal. Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Schessler v. KeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Neblett v. ElliottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Tool Research & Engineering Corp. v. HenigsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Voytko v. Ramada Inn of Atlantic CityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1978
- Prewitt v. SextonKentucky Supreme Court · 1989
- Davis v. LOCAL UNION NO. 11, INTERNAT.California Court of Appeal · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.