Legal Opinion

Heyman v. Rynar

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 14, 1929Published

1Opinion of the Court

The complainant, Heyman, bought a lot on Goodwin avenue, Newark, from the defendant Rynar and gave him a mortgage in part payment. Rynar sold the mortgage to the defendant Goldberg. The lot per survey is two feet narrower on the street line and five feet narrower in the rear than described in the deed. As described in the deed the lot would be available for a two-family house; as it in fact is, it can be used only for a one-family house. It is in a two-family house neighborhood. Heyman, a builder, bought it to build that kind of a house. It is not disputed that if the lot had a two-family…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hawthorne v. OdensonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923
  2. William F. Glasser Co. v. MuencksNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API