Hawthorne v. Odenson
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
Leaming, V. C.
The bill seeks foreclosure of a purchase-money mortgage. The deed of conveyance from complainant to defendant contains no covenant except that which is commonly known as a covenant of special warranty, that is, a covenant to defend against persons claiming under the vendor. Defendant claims a failure of title as to an essential part of the premises by a title paramount which does not fall within the covenants of the deed of conveyance. Also a failure of title of the entire premises by act of complainant falling within the covenant. Also certain fraudulent conduct on the part of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Andrus v. St. Louis Smelting & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Inhabitants of Barkhamsted v. CaseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1825
- McDonough & Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sorensen v. LarueIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Curtiss-Warner Corp. v. ThirkettleNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
- Emery v. HansenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
- Freedman v. Kensico Realty Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
- Kentucky River Coal Corp. v. Swift Coal & Timber Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.