Legal Opinion

Young v. Eriksen Construction Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1996No. S-94-880PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.

The district court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees Eriksen Construction Company (Eriksen) and First National Bank of York and dismissed plaintiff-appellant Maritta J. Young’s premises liability action. The district court found Young to be a licensee and also found that neither defendant breached the applicable duty owed to a licensee such as Young. Young filed a motion for new trial, and the motion was overruled. Young appeals. Concluding that no question of material fact exists, we now affirm the judgment of the district court.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On April 3, 1992, at…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Heins v. Webster CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. McIntosh Ex Rel. McIntosh v. Omaha Public SchoolsNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Palmtag v. Gartner Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Bruning v. Law Offices of Ronald J. Palagi, P.C.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Boyd v. ChakrabortyNebraska Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Stones v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Alexander v. JD WAREHOUSENebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Swoboda v. MERCER MANAGEMENT CO.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Blose v. MacTierNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Chelberg v. Guitars & Cadillacs of Nebraska, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API