Legal Opinion

Bundermann v. Bundermann

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 3, 1912No. Nos. 17,587—(62)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of tbe district court for Otter Tail county, entered pursuant to the order of Baxter, J., after defendant’s motion to open the default judgment and to be allowed to defend had been denied, Nye, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment of tbe district court of Otter Tail county, granting plaintiff a divorce, after denying defendant’s motion to vacate tbe order for judgment in tbe action and for leave to answer. Tbe action was for a divorce on tbe ground of desertion, and tbe summons was served personally on defendant in Chicago, Illinois, on January 22, 1910. Due proof of service was made, and by order the court limited tbe time to answer to April 6, 1910; Defendant did not answer or appear, and on April 11, 1910, tbe case was beard, and a decision and order for judgment in…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sessions v. SessionsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Langley ex rel. Hillenbrand v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Pugsley v. MagerfleischSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. In Re HillenbrandIdaho Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API