Legal Opinion

Sessions v. Sessions

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 28, 1929No. Nos. 27,258, 27,485PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 226 N.W. 211, 701. Defendant appeals from a judgment against him in contempt proceedings.

Plaintiff and defendant, who had been husband and wife since September, 1910, separated in February, 1926. On June 19, 1926, they entered into a lengthy postnuptial agreement, arrangements being made therein for practically every conceivable contingency. It provided, among other property arrangements, that defendant should pay plaintiff $35 per week until the sale of the homestead, when a lesser payment should be made, subject to the happening of certain contingent events. The homestead has…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Audubon v. ShufeldtSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Herrick v. HerrickIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Warren v. WarrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  4. Spratt v. SprattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  5. McElrath v. McElrathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Douglas v. WillcutsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Capell v. CapellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935
  4. Zieman v. ZiemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  5. State Ex Rel. Ridenour v. Superior Court for King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API