Legal Opinion

Heller v. Clark Merchandisers, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1955PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCharles J. Beckinella, J.

The motion papers reveal a dispute among three persons who among them own equally the stock of a domestic corporation, Clark Merchandisers, Inc. By a not unusual arrangement, these persons had entered into a contract for the purpose of permitting equality of control, for the sharing of the corporate offices and for the payment to them of stated salaries. Such contracts, where not violative of positive law or the rights of creditors, are permissible. (Clark v. Dodge, 269 N. Y. 410, 416; Benintendi v. Kenton Hotel, 294 N. Y. 112, 118.) The law, of course, will not sanction a “sterilized” board…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Walker Memorial Baptist Church, Inc. v. SaundersNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Flynn v. . Brooklyn City R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Clark v. DodgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Everett v. PhillipsNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. McQuade v. StonehamNew York Court of Appeals · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mangano v. AltmeyerNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Porea v. ErdmanNew York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API