Legal Opinion

United States v. Danny John Montecalvo

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 15, 1976No. 75-1125PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before HUFSTEDLER and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and REAL,* District Judge. HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:

Montecalvo appeals from his conviction for bank robbery. Only one of the three issues on appeal requires discussion: Did the district court violate Rule 32(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure by reading, prior to Montecalvo’s conviction, material presented by the probation service to assist the court in sentencing?

On the afternoon of Montecalvo’s arrest, he appeared before a federal magistrate and indicated that he wanted to waive indictment and enter a guilty plea. His lawyer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gregg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. Loretta Mae ParkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. Paul DuhartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Raymond RobinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. Danny John MontecalvoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. Mickey Claude ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. HillDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. United States v. Leonard DixonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API