Legal Opinion
Kincy v. Petro
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 17, 2010No. 16 EAP 2009Published
1Opinion of the Court
2 A.3d 490 (2010)
Alice M. KINCY, Appellant
v.
Nancy PETRO, Appellee.
No. 16 EAP 2009.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued October 21, 2009.
Decided August 17, 2010.
Andrew R. Spirt, Golomb & Honik, P.C., for Alice M. Kincy.
Joseph Allen Ross, Robert J. Casey, Jr. & Associates, Philadelphia, for Nancy Petro.
BEFORE: CASTILLE, C.J., SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, TODD, McCAFFERY, GREENSPAN, JJ.
OPINION
Justice TODD.
In this appeal, we consider the effect of a trial court order purporting to consolidate, under Rule 213(a) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, two separate actions involving different parties…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Connor v. Allegheny General HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Azinger v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Kincy v. PetroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Tork-Hiis v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Mosside Associates, Ltd. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.