Legal Opinion
Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. Highway Trailer Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided August 21, 1931No. 2486PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, District Judge.
The plaintiff sues upon five patents, and the defendant counterclaims upon one patent.
The plaintiff’s patents as they are distinguished in the record are Borst patent, No. 1,374,352, issued April 12, 1921 (the first Borst patent); Borst patent, No. 1,383,381, issued July 5, 1921 (the second Borst patent) ; Land patent, No. 1,400,752, issued December 20, 1921; Hartwiek patent, No. 1,351,245, issued August 31, 1920; and Schneider and Fruehauf patent, No. 1,613,-728, issued January 11, 1927.
The first four of plaintiff’s patents relate to what are known in the art as…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Carbice Corp. of America v. American Patents Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Burr v. DuryeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Dunbar v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Ensten v. Simon, Ascher & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Henry J. Kaiser Company v. McLouth Steel Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1966
- James Heddon's Sons v. Millsite Steel & Wire Works, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1940
- Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. Highway Trailer Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
- Kearney & Trecker Corp. v. Cincinnati Milacron, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1975
- Mershon v. O'NeillDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.