Legal Opinion

Mershon v. O'Neill

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 22, 1932No. 5405PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYERS, District Judge.

The plaintiffs sue in equity for alleged infringement of United States Letters Patent No. 1,141,402, issued June 1, 1915 (application filed June 19, 1913), and No. 1,-784,674, issued December 9, 1930 (application filed July 14, 1923). For convenience, these will be referred to hereinafter as the first and second patents.

Both were issued to the plaintiff Mershon, who, in turn, licensed the corporate plaintiff’s predecessor to make, use and sell the inventions covered by the said patents.

The device involved is known as an electrolytic condenser, and, in the form presently…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holland Furniture Co. v. Perkins Glue Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Grasselli Chemical Co. v. National Aniline & Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  3. Bassick Mfg. Co. v. Ready Auto Supply Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1927
  4. Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. Highway Trailer Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mershon v. Sprague Specialties Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1937
  2. Pennsylvania Research Corp. v. Lescarboura Spawn Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Sprague Specialties Co. v. MershonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1934
  4. Illinois Cent. R. Co., Inc. v. OlberdingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
  5. Polk v. Del Gatto Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API