Legal Opinion
Kearney & Trecker Corp. v. Cincinnati Milacron, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided October 17, 1975No. Civ. A. 6019, 6146PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
DAVID S. PORTER, District Judge:
These are consolidated actions in which plaintiff charges the defendant with infringement of patents on automatic tool changers important to automation in the machine tool industry. In such actions the defendant in its amended answer asserts the defense of collateral estoppel and in a counterclaim charges plaintiff with antitrust violations and seeks declaratory judgment that plaintiff’s patents in suit are invalid, not infringed, and unenforceable. The jurisdiction of the Court is not contested.
Plaintiff, Kearney & Treeker Corporation (a…
2Cases cited98 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kearney & Trecker Corp. v. Cincinnati Milacron Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- Maple v. Citizens National Bank & Trust Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1977
- Huron Machine Products, Inc. v. A. & E. Warbern, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Vulcan, Inc. v. Fordees Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1978
- Huron Machine Products, Inc. v. A. And E. WarbernCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.