Landau v. Hynes
New York Court of Appeals
1DissentJones, J.
I am persuaded that the activating letters from the Commissioners of Health and Social Services to the Attorney-General lacked the specificity contemplated by subdivision 3 of section 63 of the Executive Law and accordingly that Deputy Attorney-General Hynes did not have authority to issue the Grand Jury subpoenas which are sought to be quashed in this proceeding;
Subdivision 3, one of the subdivisions of that section under which the Attorney-General may be authorized to investigate and to prosecute, provides:
*139"The attorney-general shall:
"3. Upon request of the governor, comptroller, secretary…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Matter of A'hearn v. Comm. on Unlawful Practice of the Law of the New York County Lawyers'ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Sigety v. HynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. Tru-Sport Publishing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1936
- People v. TomaselloNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Friedman v. Hi-Li Manor Home for AdultsNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.