Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Hi-Li Manor Home for Adults
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 7, 1977PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
In these three cases we hold that the Deputy *412Attorney-General had authority by the issuance of an office subpoena duces tecum under subdivision 8 of section 63 of the Executive Law to compel the production of books and records of private proprietary homes for adults.
On August 2, 1976 the Governor issued Executive Order No. 36 (9 NYCRR 3.36) directing the Attorney-General, or his deputy "to inquire into all matters concerning the administration, management, control, operation, supervision, funding and quality of private proprietary homes for adults, or any principal, operator, agent, supplier…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Matter of Edge Ho Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Myerson v. Lentini Brothers Moving & Storage Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Additional January 1979 Grand Jury of Albany Supreme Court v. DoeNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Landau v. HynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Reuters Ltd. v. Dow Jones Telerate, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In Re Nassau County Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated June 24, 2003New York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Glenwood TV, Inc. v. RatnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.