Legal Opinion
United States of America, and v. Lindsay Martell, and United States of America, and v. Joseph Minneci, And
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 6, 1981No. 80-1163, 80-1154PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CURTIS, District Judge:
Appellants Martell and Minneci were convicted of “conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute” and “possession of cocaine with intent to distribute” in violation of Title 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. They appeal from an order of the trial court refusing to suppress as evidence narcotics seized at the time of their arrest. Finding that the motion was properly denied, we affirm.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
On September 30, 1979, DEA agent Charles Kenerson, based in San Diego, received a telephone call from a DEA agent in Anchorage, Alaska. Kenerson understood the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. Peter JodoinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- United States v. John Irving Hillison, United States of America v. Murray David Jacobson, United States of America v. Jeffrey Ketchum MansfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Commonwealth v. LapiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- United States v. Charles M. Anderson, Sandra Jane Szabo, and Luis Eduardo FerreiraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Darrell Dominique PulliamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.