Legal Opinion

United States v. Darrell Dominique Pulliam

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 21, 2005No. 03-50550PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge.

Following a lawful traffic stop of a car in which Defendant-Appellee Pulliam was a passenger, the police illegally detained him and the car’s driver, and illegally searched the car. The search produced a gun, and Pulliam was charged with being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).

The government appeals from the district court’s order suppressing the gun. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3231, and we have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3731. Because Pulliam lacks standing to object to the vehicle…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert MosleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. State v. SundSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  4. United States v. AnkenyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. JarviCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API