United States v. Charles M. Anderson, Sandra Jane Szabo, and Luis Eduardo Ferreira
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. BURNS, District Judge:
The government appeals from an order granting the appellees’ motions to suppress evidence seized from five pieces of luggage after the appellees were arrested for possession of cocaine. 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). It contends that the appellees are precluded from challenging the search because they lack a reasonable expectation of privacy in the luggage and that, in any case, the evidence was not obtained as the result of an illegal stop or an illegal arrest. We reverse and remand to the district court for further findings of fact, as specified below.
BACKGROUND
On…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Zepeda v. United States Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Juan Manuel Bautista, United States of America v. Javier Cabrera-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Virginia Zepeda v. United States Immigration And Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Edward X. MondelloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.