Emanuel Medical Center, Turlock, California v. Sebelius
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Gladys Kessler, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs are two hospitals, Emanuel Medical Center (“Emanuel”) and Merced Community Medical Center (“Merced”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs” or “Providers”). They bring this action against Kathleen Sebelius in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (“Defendant” or “Secretary”), pursuant to Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1395 et seq. (“the Medicare Act”). Plaintiffs seek judicial review of a final agency decision that the Provider Reimbursement Review Board (“PRRB” or…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sebelius v. Auburn Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense CenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services v. AhlbornSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Bethesda Hospital Assn. v. BowenSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Empire Health Foundation v. BurwellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Flint v. Alex M. Azar, IIDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- St. Helena Clear Lake Hospital v. Azar, IIDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- St. Mary's of Michigan v. AzarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Winder Hma LLC v. BurwellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016