Legal Opinion

Flint v. Alex M. Azar, II

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 31, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2018-2005Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MCLAREN FLINT, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 18-2005 (RDM) ALEX M. AZAR II, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Under the Medicare Statute,

42 U.S.C. § 1395

et seq., a provider “dissatisfied with a final determination” of “the amount of total program reimbursement due to the provider” for Medicare-covered services (known as notice of program reimbursement or “NPR”) may appeal the NPR within 180 days to the Provider Reimbursement Review Board (the “Board”),

id.

§ 1395oo(a)). Separate and apart…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Amer Bioscience Inc v. Thompson, Tommy G.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  2. Allentown MacK Sales & Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Sebelius v. Auburn Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Sierra Club v. MainellaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. Azar v. Allina Health ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API