Gober v. Khalaf
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Patricia Gober appeals from a judgment based on a jury verdict for Dr. Omar H. Khalaf on Gober's claims of assault, battery, and medical negligence. The issues in this case involve the admission or exclusion of evidence at trial.
A trial court has wide discretion to determine whether evidence is relevant, material, or remote and has wide discretion to exclude or to admit evidence, even if that evidence is of minor probative value, so long as that evidence sheds light on, but does not withdraw from, the main inquiry. See AmSouth Bank, N.A. v. Spigener, 505 So.2d 1030 (Ala. 1986); Ryan v. Acuff,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Henderson by Hartsfield v. Alabama PowerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- White Consol. Ind. v. American LibertySupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Ryan v. AcuffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Valley Min. Corp., Inc. v. Metro BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Amsouth Bank, N.A. v. SpigenerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Zielke v. Amsouth Bank, N.A.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
- Beaulieu of America, Inc. v. KilgoreCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
- Fomby v. PopwellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
- Bolden v. LangCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
- Haynes v. HaynesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.