Legal Opinion
Brunelle v. Signore
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 31, 1989No. E006398PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT. *
Plaintiff David Brunelle has appealed from a judgment entered following the trial court’s granting of defendant’s (Anthony Signore’s) motion for summary judgment. On appeal, plaintiff contends that the trial court abused its discretion in granting summary judgment in favor of defendant. He argues that the questions of foreseeability and reasonableness of defendant’s actions are questions of fact for the jury to decide. After consideration of the factors discussed in Rowland v. Christian (1968) 69 Cal.2d 108 [70 Cal.Rptr. 97, 443 P.2d 561, 32 A.L.R.3d 496], we have…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Ballard v. UribeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Isaacs v. Huntington Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Peter W. v. San Francisco Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Residents of Beverly Glen, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Copeland v. Lodge Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- FSR Brokerage, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Miranda v. Bomel Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Nicholson v. Herman, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
- Salazar v. Southern Cal. Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.