Legal Opinion
State v. Finan
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 16, 2005No. SC 17185PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
The defendant, Michael Finan, appeals, following our grant of certification to appeal, from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming his conviction and concluding that the trial court properly admitted into evidence the lay opinion testimony of four police officers as to the identification of the defendant on a surveillance videotape of a robbery. State v. Finan, 82 Conn. App. 222, 233, 240, 843 A.2d 630 (2004). The defendant claims that the Appellate Court improperly determined that the opinion testimony of the four police officers was not an opinion as to the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. SpigaroloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. HeinzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. GrenierSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- United States v. Charles Alton Sellers, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- State v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. BeaversSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. HolleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- State v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Isham v. IshamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.