Legal Opinion

Schmid Brothers, Inc. v. W. Goebel Porzellanfabrik KG.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 20, 1984No. 77 C 1419PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NICKERSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff Schmid Brothers, Inc. (Schmid), a Massachusetts corporation, invoking jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a), seeks a judgment that it is co-proprietor of United States renewal copyrights in five works, two plaques and three figurines, allegedly co-authored by the well known artist, Sister Berta Hummel (Sister Hummel). Defendants are W. Goebel Porzellanfabrik K.G. (Goebel), a German limited partnership manufacturing and selling ceramic art works, and Portfolio Press Corp. (Portfolio), a book publisher. Portfolio is not now involved in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. New Hampshire Bankers Ass'n v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Miller Music Corp. v. Charles N. Daniels, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Picture Music, Inc. v. Bourne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  4. G. Ricordi & Co. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  5. Epoch Producing Corp. v. Killiam Shows, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cambridge Literary Properties, Ltd. v. W. Goebel Porzellanfabrik G.M.B.H. & Co. Kg.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
  2. Alco Standard Corp. v. Schmid Bros., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  3. Nadel & Sons Toy Corp. v. William Shaland Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API