Legal Opinion

Miller Music Corp. v. Charles N. Daniels, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 18, 1960No. 214PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

Petitioner, a music publisher, sued respondent, another music publisher, for infringement of petitioner’s rights through one Ben Black, as coauthor, in the renewal copyright of the song “Moonlight and Roses.” Respondent’s motion for summary judgment was granted, 158 F. Supp. 188, and the Court of Appeals affirmed by a divided vote. 265 F. 2d 925. The case is here on a petition for a writ of certiorari which we granted. 361 U. S. 809. .

The facts are stipulated. Ben Black and Charles Daniels composed the song and assigned it to Villa Moret, Inc., which secured the original copyright. Prior to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. De Sylva v. BallentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Fred Fisher Music Co. v. M. Witmark & SonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Fox Film Corp. v. KnowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Miller Music Corporation v. Charles N. Daniels, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  5. Miller Music Corporation v. Charles N. Daniels, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Stewart v. AbendSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Roger Miller Music, Inc., and Mary A. Miller, Plaintiffs-Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Sony/atv Publishing, Llc, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. Jonson v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2002
  5. Stone v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API