Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided August 28, 2015No. 2472 A-11121PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

For centuries, Anglo-American law has recognized the power of the courts to hold litigants in contempt for disruption of judicial proceedings and willful disobedience of judicial orders. The question presented in this appeal is: When someone violates (or allegedly violates) a court order, who decides whether the situation merits a contempt proceeding?

Traditionally, the law has entrusted this decision to the court whose order was disobeyed. But the State argues that the executive branch now has the authority to pursue contempt proceedings against people and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. State v. BrowderAlaska Supreme Court · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Yankee v. City and Borough of JuneauAlaska Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API